Showing posts with label Sam Raimi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sam Raimi. Show all posts
Saturday, June 6, 2026
Send Help
The viewer is immediately confronted with a question by this movie: was the casting of Rachel McAdams in the lead role a mistake? The issue arises from the fact that her character, Linda, is presented from the start as a nebbish and unattractive creature—which is a difficult sell when McAdams, who has famously portrayed hotties in prominent roles, is the creature in question. Wouldn’t it have made more sense to cast an actual, non-physically perfect actress in the role, for some legitimacy? The issue is only given more weight by the film’s early scenes, which indulge in any number of clichés about office politics and interpersonal dynamics. Perhaps dolling up—or down, as it were—a standard beauty to portray a fugly was just another example of moviemaking laziness. Or so one might think. As the story goes on, though, it becomes clear that Linda straddling the line between attractive and unattractive is a core component of the narrative. You’re never quite certain who the villain really is here, until the unwinding of the plot eventually leaves no doubt. Before you get to that point, the story delivers plenty of entertainment, including thrills, scares and more than a few outright laughs along the way. By the end, you can appreciate the importance of—as the lady herself would tell you—strategy and planning. That’s what went into this work, and the early questions are all part of the plan. Not a bad trip, and worth the time you spend there.
Monday, June 27, 2022
Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness
Cameos, assemble! The eyeroll quotient is extremely high here, and a lot of the interest-generation in this outing comes from seeing who shows up where. For all the wizard flash in the title and feature scenes, this flick is at least as much Elizabeth Olsen's movie, which is a good thing, especially as her appearances in the Scarlet Witch outfit (both the official uniform and the Halloween costume) were the best parts of WandaVision. As for the overall story here? The whole thing ultimately plays out like a grandiose extra, final episode of the aforementioned TV series, and barely anything more than that. More and more, I see the superhero genre approaching its end-of-shelf-life--especially if all of the upcoming works are going to hit us again and again with the same characters, struggling for the same stakes, and leaving the viewer with the same sense that we’ve been here before. At least, if you’re a subscriber, you can say you didn’t directly pay for this one. Certainly, only a fool would buy a ticket for this franchise at this point. Let’s see the Mouse wizard its way out of that scenario. Wednesday, January 8, 2014
Oz the Great and Powerful
The crux of the matter here lies with the source material. To wit: are we seeing a faithful representation of Baum’s work, or is this a Disneyfied version of the extended world of Oz? Having only read one of the Oz works--that one--I can’t say for sure; maybe the weaknesses are Baum’s and not those of the Disney people or director Sam Raimi. Even with a certain obviousness to the story--it’s a tale that practically wallows in stereotypes--you can still get a good, old-fashioned movie-viewing experience out of this film. It all depends on how high your critical threshold is; demanding types, stay away, but those more open will probably have a decent time.
Tuesday, September 18, 2007
Evil Dead 2
As a straightforward horror flick, this would just be another bad movie.
But the genius stroke of remaking the original (a low key success in
its own right, in its much more straightforward way) as a horror-comedy--with wry, almost perverse humor and a
gleeful use of gore--elevates these proceedings considerably. No wonder these guys (a couple of them, at least) went on to bigger and better things.
Saturday, July 10, 2004
Spider-man 2
Yes, I think it is better than the first. A world of credit goes to the
cast for an entire collection of wonderful performances, all deep and
emotionally resonant. And it helps that the script is more interested in
questions about personal identity and responsibility than in blowing
things up. I'd go along with a third in the series, if they're willing
to keep up the quality.
Monday, August 26, 2002
The Gift
Saturday, June 8, 2002
Spider-man
Saturday, January 22, 2000
Saturday, August 24, 1991
Darkman
Lots of fun. An early taste of the Sam Raimi/Rob Tapert collaboration's potential (before they went on to Hercules and Xena glory). And, as an added bonus, this one stars Liam Neeson before he became a big shot, in another case of an early taste of what was to come. Ditto Frances McDormand. A pretty strong legacy for a little-movie-that-could type flick.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
