Showing posts with label George Takei. Show all posts
Showing posts with label George Takei. Show all posts

Saturday, May 23, 2020

Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country

Ultimately, not a bad way to go out. And they knew it, too--this film is almost smothered in self-conscious recognition that this crew was on its last ride, and thus they wanted to make the most of it. Did they succeed? Well, to a certain extent, yes. This outing served as an appropriate wrap for the old cast, with enough quality work in the script and performances to overcome a certain amount of schmaltz, as well as some relatively annoying work from Christopher Plummer (whose character spews out Shakespeare quotes like he has some sort of literary Tourette's syndrome). In part, what happens here was constrained by the need to set up the continuation of the franchise (by this point the next-gen series had launched), plus there was a little too much playing to the base with knowing lines, cameos, and tropes. This is not a classic by any means, but it's hardly an embarrassment for a group of old pros, who might be missed more than they are if this and previous outings in the series did not exist. One could hardly begrudge them this valediction.

Tuesday, May 19, 2020

Star Trek Vi: The Voyage Home

Watching this again after so many years, it's hard to believe it was released as a major motion picture. Though well received at the time, it plays much more like a TV movie now, demonstrating just how hard it can be to make the jump from the little tube to the big screen. The cast, though increasingly long in the tooth, do a decent job with a good--albeit not exactly riveting--story. All in all, though, the proceedings as a whole come across as mundane. They really were better off sticking to space; take the stars out of the trek and everything becomes a little boring. Still, diehard fans--and no franchise's fans die harder--will probably find a lot of appeal in this outing. But it was clear at this point that it was time for new blood to take over the mission.

Star Trek III: The Search for Spock

Appropriate that this movie is mostly about looking for a dead guy--it's a little stiff. One wonders what happened between the previous outing and this one; a lot of the good momentum from II dissipated here. The movie is largly lifeless and static, there are casting issues (with the supporting cast), and the story, for the most part, just doesn't have nearly enough urgency (or, frankly, interest) for the average viewer. Mostly, this outing was basically just a way to ensure that the titular fan favorite was not really dead going forward, thus setting up future efforts. And that, folks, is how you build a franchise...besides actually making decent movies, of course.

Friday, May 15, 2020

Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan

Right here. This is where it happened--where the whole Star Trek franchise passed its bottleneck and became a thing that had a major future in the entertainment world. And, upon re-viewing, it's easy to see how that went down. This movie is a large step up from the previous outing, especially in its story, script, and even its acting (even the notoriously hammy Shatner acquits himself well here). It still comes across as dated, especially in its look and tech conventions--the then state-of-the-art screen graphics are laughable now--but everything else works incredibly well. None of the successor movies made it up to this level, at least where the original cast was concerned, but the effect of this outing was enough to give the property momentum well into the next century. The 23rd century? That's to be determined--but a betting man would probably look at this evidence and conclude the whole enterprise will continue to live long, and prosper.

Sunday, May 10, 2020

Star Trek: The Motion Picture

The galaxy gets attacked by Laserium. I hadn't seen this flick in about 40 years, so it was almost a fresh experience for me. Except, it wasn't all that fresh, because everything seemed so dated. I watched this outing as part of a project to review the entire Star Trek ouvre, and this followed directly on watching all of the original series, which seemed fresher and more inventive in contrast, even with its cheesier elements in place. There was a certain pleasure to be had in seeing those old cast members together and working their way through more of the old hokum, but it was the external details of this movie version of the story--disposable characters whom no one had any particular feeling for, lots of long, ponderous visuals (the sort of thing done better by near-contemporary films like Alien and Blade Runner--I guess they should have hired Ridley Scott to put this one together), and a partially recycled plot-line--that made the work not quite up to snuff. Still, one has to appreciate this movie as the kick-off point for the revival--even creation, in a sense--of a franchise that in the long run has been something extraordinary in the history of science fiction film and television. Few of the sci-fi works before or since the original series and its descendants have ever called upon humankind to follow the better angels of its nature more forcefully than Gene Roddenberry's vision. and a certain amount of gratitude must be felt for that.